Green-eyed monster of a writer

When I read something mind-blowing, I get stuck between joy and jealousy. The former emotion comes from the reader in me, desperate to get caught up in a well-told story; the latter comes from the writer in me, desperate to create something truly special. The reader wants to revel in brilliance and uniqueness, since both are near impossible to find (if you know me in the physical world, you’ll know I have a fierce aversion to casual use of the word unique); the writer doesn’t like being shown how far I am from creating something excellent.

I admit this now, because when the two halves collide I want the positives to win out. With famous or historically significant authors, it’s easier. I recent read Slaughterhouse-Five. Every few pages, I had to stop to appreciate how the story was told. I was thinking, “There’s no scenario in this world (or on Tralfamadore, for that matter, or anywhere beyond) that would allow me to write like this. I’ll never construct a story like Vonnegut does – in a way that seems new.” But on the other hand, it was like watching a piano prodigy perform a piece they composed. It was great, but it was unfathomable. How could I be jealous? Sure, I’ll never be Vonnegut, but who will? No one. No one will come close.

With other writers of my… expertise? Amateur status?… it’s much harder to squash the irritation and let pure admiration through. A girl at work shared some of her writing with me last week (side note: This was a big deal. I’m relatively new in a huge office where no one really knows me. Am I making friends?). What she shared was so good. This is how good it was: It reminded me of Salman Rushdie.

At first I was a little pissed. The writer in me whined, “But I’m the writer! Who does this girl think she is?”  Then the reader, who is much less of a toddler, pointed out that the writing was awesome, and I should be friggin’ jazzed to read it. Under the happy rationality of the reader’s influence, I was able to praise the girl’s work as it deserved, and for that I’ll be proud (or at least not ashamed). I should note that the girl wasn’t looking to be petted; she was just excited to share her words with someone who also enjoys writing. That helped beat down the less flattering emotions.

Why do I tell you all this, reader? Is there a lesson to be learned? Maybe. Maybe it’s good to address my writerly insecurities – to show them in the light and see their real size. Then again, perhaps it’s just a self-indulgent airing of petty inner demons.

‘Til next time.

Meanwhile in my imagination…

Hello readers,

You may have noticed that this [beloved] site [that you can’t stop reading] has received a facelift – or, actually, a re-branding. After writing the post Writer does not equal storyteller, I realized that I want to celebrate not just the written word, but story in general. The concept of 10,000 hours of writing was shelved, and Meanwhile was born.

The content will be similar – the written word is still my favourite of the vehicles of story – but the intention of the blog has shifted in a deliberate way.

Don’t you love change?

Writer does not equal storyteller

Like so many people who have a desperate, unquenchable passion for the written word, from a very young age I fancied myself a storyteller. Imagine, then, how disappointing it was to realize that I am just a good writer, a good speaker, and crafting a good story is a wholly different talent.

It was a few years back, and I was watching the splendidly written show, Gilmore Girls. One of my favourite insights from the entire series came when Emily Gilmore (matriarch of the Gilmore clan) decides she wants to set up Chris (Lorelai’s, um… baby daddy) on a date.

Cue scene:

EMILY: What about Brandi Covington? She’s a lovely girl with a wonderful sense of humor.
LORELAI: “A wonderful sense of humor”?
EMILY: Yes.
LORELAI: What joke has Brandi Covington ever told?
EMILY: Well, I don’t know.
LORELAI: She has a wonderful sense of humor. Tell me one of her jokes.
EMILY: I don’t know any.
LORELAI: An amusing anecdote she’s told?
EMILY: I don’t know, Lorelai.
LORELAI: A giggle-inducing pun.
EMILY: Lorelai.
LORELAI: Dirty limericks, song parody.
EMILY: Well, she has a lovely laugh.
LORELAI: Oh, so she does not have a wonderful sense of humor; she can appreciate a wonderful sense of humor.
EMILY: I guess that’s right.

It’s a good little scene from perhaps my least favourite season of the show, and it stuck in my head.

What had I learned? Appreciating funny doesn’t make you funny, just as appreciating amazing storytelling doesn’t give you the capacity to tell an amazing story. Not all great readers can be great writers too. Is that unfair?

Since then, I’ve been trying to focus on story in my writing. I don’t believe I possess the pure, raw storytelling prowess of some of those around me: my father, who is a social chameleon; my friend Emily, who shares intimate details of her life with a disarming ease and self-deprecating humour; my best friend’s husband Jon, who sells every second of a story with enthusiasm and passion; and, that little girl on the bus who – unlike her pint-sized peers – does not fill her silences with “umm” and has comedic timing far more precise than mine. These people are my inspiration and my tutors. They are special. They do naturally what so many people strive to do effectively in blogs and social media statuses; they make their lives worth talking about. It’s a phenomenal talent. Do they realize the power of their gift?

There’s something so potent about storytellers. They are a greater force than writers. They live inside the emotion and the meaning of their tales. Good storytellers can communicate something that is 100% cliché or predictable or banal, and make it worth listening to or reading.

I want that. I want to tell an amazing story and support it with grammar and flow and vocabulary and be extraordinary.

One day.

Organization, multi-level lists, and the numbers of editing

Hello dear readers.

Shall I express my sincere apologies for posting nothing but writing prompts for the last number of weeks? I shan’t, for I was deep within a story that demanded every moment of focus and creativity, and I happily neglected this blog. The Nereid is the story that emerged from the rough, disorganized, hopelessly bland mass of words I squished out of my mind from NaNoWriMo 2013. In all honesty, I had intended to pick it up again in January… but when I read it through I could not mentally traverse the leagues of work that remained to be done to salvage it.

Then, about a month ago, something clicked. And then something else clicked. Then things were clicking all over the place, like being surrounded by people cracking their knuckles (except, you know, in a pleasant and productive kind of way…), and I was able to move forward on the project.

The greatest issue I was having with my story was how it would be told through time. My draft was a hodge-podge of different techniques.

Inspired by my new job, which at times requires me to format hundred-page, multi-level documents, I did a timeline of my story – from the beginning of time until a generation past its “conclusion” – and assigned each level of the story a number.

For example (not actually the plot of The Nereid):

Part 1: Pre-history of the protagonist
Timeline: 2002-2027
Section 1.1: Protagonist has an accident-prone childhood
Chapter 1.1.1: Protagonist falls down the stairs
Chapter 1.1.2: Protagonist gets hit by a car
Chapter 1.1.3: Protagonist gets hit by a meteor
Section 1.2: Protagonist has a period of incredibly graceful teenage years
Chapter 1.2.1: Protagonist is forced to take dance lessons in high school gym class, and has natural talent
Chapter 1.2.2: Protagonist auditions for a reality dance show
Part 2:  Main body of the story
Timeline: 2027-2034

When I created a timeline for my story, I listed the general plot points that coordinated with each Part, Section, and Chapter in increasing detail. Then, where applicable, I pasted any corresponding parts of my NaNoWriMo draft in the appropriate chapter.

This was an incredibly useful process that I’ve never used before. This multi-level timeline allowed me to see the progression of events from the first moment to the last, assess where my plot was fuzzy or inconsistent, see the places in the story where I have opportunities for character and plot development, and – perhaps most importantly – get a good sense of how much work there still is to do. But my favourite thing about working in these numbered portions is how simple it is to manage my master file. Believe me. It’s a dream.

Until next time, readers.

A reality show to blow the minds of book lovers

Do you know what week it is? It’s the week to watch Canadian celebrities face off in a literary battle for the ages as part of Canada Reads 2014. Winner gets… the bragging rights of representing the One Novel to Change Our Nation. And maybe a trophy? That part is sort of fuzzy. Check out the chart to see who is arguing for what.

The panelist

The book

The author

Stephen Lewis is one of Canada’s most prominent philanthropists. A Companion of the Order of Canada, he’s the chair of the Stephen Lewis Foundation, which provides support to women and children in Africa living with HIV/AIDS. The Year of the Flood is the second book in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy, which deals with a dystopic future world that emerges after years of environmental degradation. Margaret Atwood is one of Canada’s most beloved writers and respected thinkers, with more than 40 books to her credit — novels, short stories, poetry, literary criticism, social history, and books for children.
Wab Kinew is an award-winning journalist, aboriginal activist and hip-hop artist. He’s currently the first director of indigenous inclusion at the University of Winnipeg. The Orenda is a visceral portrait of life at a crossroads in early Canadian history, and about the arrival of a Jesuit missionary into the life of a Huron elder and a gifted young Iroquois girl. Joseph Boyden is the author of three novels, including Through Black Spruce, which won the Scotiabank Giller Prize in 2008.
Donovan Bailey is one of the fastest people in the world, and was a two-time gold medallist at the 1996 Olympic Games. He still holds the world record for the indoor 50-metre dash. Evoking the world of Paris during the Second World War, Half-Blood Blues is about the disappearance of Hiero, a talented young black German jazz musician at the hands of the Nazi Party, and his friend and fellow musician, Sid, who is still coming to terms with Hiero’s fate 50 years later. Esi Edugyan is one of Canada’s hottest young writers. Half-Blood Blues is her second novel, and it won the Scotiabank Giller Prize in 2011.
Samantha Bee is an award-winning comic, actor and writer. She has been a correspondent on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart since 2003. Set during a frigid Montreal winter, Cockroach is an urgent, unsettling and insightful novel about the city’s immigrant community. Rawi Hage was born in Beirut and has lived in Montreal since the early 1990s. He is the author of three acclaimed novels, and is currently the writer-in-residence at the Vancouver Public Library.
Sarah Gadon is one of Canada’s most promising young actors and a rising star in Hollywood. She has appeared in David Cronenberg’s two most recent films, “A Dangerous Method” and “Cosmopolis,” and will be seen in several major films in 2014. Annabel is a sensitive and compelling portrait of an intersex child who is raised in rural Newfoundland as male, and yet is unable to repress his feminine side. Kathleen Winter is an award-winning author and former columnist for the Telegram in St. John’s, Newfoundland.

No matter who wins, the viewer gets the real prize. Any time you get to listen to Samantha Bee do anything, it’s a treat.

Today is day two (*link spoiler alert*) of the four-day reality debate show which you can take in any way you like your CBC (radio, TV, web). The first and second debate have concluded. I‘m not going to tell you which books/celebrities/authors have been “kicked off the island” so far, because it’s worth watching.

You should tune in tomorrow. Here’s how:

Web: Watch the livestream of the debates and participate in a daily live chat starting at 10 a.m. ET. An on-demand viadeo of the show will be available every afternoon.

CBC Radio One: Canada Reads will air at 11 a.m. local time (1:30 p.m. NL) on CBC Radio One. A podcast of the show will be available every afternoon. A repeat broadcast will air at 8 p.m. (8:30 p.m. in NL). The debates will also air each day on SiriusXM 169 at 11 a.m., 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. the following day.

CBC-TV: Watch on CBC-TV at 4 p.m. local time, or on Documentary at 7 p.m. ET and at midnight ET.

If you miss it all, there will be a one-hour recap special on CBC Radio One on March 8 at 4 p.m. local time (4:30 in NL) and a broadcast special on CBC-TV at 1 p.m. (1:30 in NL).

Happy viewing!

S.E. Lund